Camilla Rosatello vs Sarah Melany Fajmonova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 11 Jun at 09:38 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Rosatello vs S. Melany Fajmonova

ITA
0
Win
Played
0
Win

CZE
0
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Rosatello 0 - 0 Fajmonova
The last match between Sarah Melany Fajmonova and Camilla Rosatello was at the W75 Ceska Lipa, 12-06-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Draw getting the victory w/o.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Rosatello | 0 |
| Fajmonova | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W75 Ceska Lipa(06-12-25)
C. Rosatello vs S. M. Fajmonova H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $49,841 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 56.82% (400-304) | Career Total W/L | 58.82% (20-14) |
| 2 | Titles | 1 |
| 33.33% (1-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. Rosatello vs S. M. Fajmonova Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Recently, Rosatello has excelled with 42.68% of points won on her second serve, higher than Fajmonova's 37.87%. Does this indicate an advantage in service games? Likely, yes.
- Return Game: Fajmonova has a slight edge, winning 53.94% of points on opponents' second serves compared to Rosatello's 51.52%. Fajmonova also leads on first serve returns, capturing 34.15% over Rosatello's 29.92%. Who can claim the advantage in returning serves? Fajmonova.
- Pressure Moments: Both players have similar proficiency under pressure, with Fajmonova saving 48.7% of breakpoints and Rosatello saving slightly more at 50.75%.
- Last Year Overview: Fajmonova boasts a higher win percentage, securing 73.68% of matches, overshadowing Rosatello's 58.57%. Could this wider success in matches hint at a favorite? Possibly, Fajmonova.
- Preferred Surface: Fajmonova is dominant on clay (74% win rate), whereas Rosatello thrives on indoor hard courts (58%). How might surface preference influence the outcome? Depending on the surface, this could be crucial.
- Competitor Level: Rosatello plays against higher-ranked opponents (average rank: 292.64) compared to Fajmonova (average rank: 447.11). Could this reflect on her competitive readiness? Likely, yes.
- Deciding Sets: Fajmonova shows resilience, winning 80% of deciding sets versus Rosatello's 75%. How critical is this for potential three-set matches? Crucial for Fajmonova.
- Breakpoint Conversion: Fajmonova's breakpoint conversion rate (48.35%) surpasses Rosatello's (39.19%). Can this ability turn challenges into opportunities in crucial moments? Yes, favoring Fajmonova.
Editorial Prediction (June 11, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match promises a fierce showdown, considering both players have shown strong and strategic cope with competitive situations. Fajmonova's higher match win rate and superior background in returning serves might offer her an upper hand in crucial moments.
Rosatello's advantage on the second serve and history against tougher opponents could make it a closely contested match. However, Fajmonova’s resilience in deciding sets and effective breakpoint conversion offers her a tangible edge.
Based on the statistical insights, Fajmonova emerges as the more likely winner, leveraging her strengths in return games and overall performance trends.
Camilla Rosatello vs Sarah Melany Fajmonova Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Recent Performance Stats
C. Rosatello Recent Matches Played
S. M. Fajmonova Recent Matches Played

C. Rosatello vs S. M. Fajmonova Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.82% (400/304) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.82% (20/14) |
| 55.22% (889/721) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.41% (44/34) |
| 52.29% (7685/7012) | Games Win/Loss | 51.19% (365/348) |
| 55.00% (88/72) | Hard Win/Loss | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 57.60% (250/184) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.71% (17/11) |
| 57.41% (62/46) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66.67% (2/1) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 872 | Aces Total | 42 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.35 |
| 1647 | Total Double Faults | 120 |
| 1:5:10 | Average Match Time | 2:21:39 |
| 514.61 | Average Opponent Rank | 454.76 |
| 59% (18755/31633) | 1st Serve % | 61% (1378/2248) |
| 62% (11659/18755) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (845/1378) |
| 44% (5636/12878) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (391/870) |
| 47% (1987/4186) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (138/291) |
| 46% (15146/32744) | Return Points Win % | 46% (1022/2228) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 46.88% (15/17) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56.24% (266/207) | Challenger W/L | 57.14% (4/3) |
| 60.51% (118/77) | Futures W/L | 59.26% (16/11) |
| 57% (395/692) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (20/34) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (73/143) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 40% (2/5) |
| 56% (119/213) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (6/10) |
| 89% (372/330) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (18/16) |
| 11% (372/41) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (18/2) |
| 21% (331/69) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (16/4) |